<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portrait of an Environmental Hack Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/07/21/portrait-of-an-environmental-hack-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/07/21/portrait-of-an-environmental-hack-job/</link>
	<description>Exploring the New Values of the 21st Century Citizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Kling</title>
		<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/07/21/portrait-of-an-environmental-hack-job/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Kling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/07/21/portrait-of-an-environmental-hack-job/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>One problem I have with this whole issue is the concept of ’scientific consensus’. Consensus is a political, not scientific, term. Science requires research, experimentation and debate. But &#039;consensus&quot; is never the goal.

Here’s an interesting, albeit non-scientific, exercise: You know there’s lot’s of information to find out there by doing a Google search for ‘global warming’, and a lot of it is quite scary; but try adding ‘climatologist’ to your search terms and the results - the ‘consensus’, if you will - changes dramatically. It’s quite interesting how many actual climatologists are anthropogenic global warming doubters, compared with the doomsayers who are mostly in other fields like geology, biology, journalism, politics, fashion, and entertainment.

Try it -

http://www.google.com/ search?hl=en&amp;q=climatologist+global+warming

And then consider this question - What causes ice ages? They are cyclical, as you know; so doesn&#039;t it seem logical that the warming periods between ice ages are part of the same cycle? Go ahead and do another Google search. Also, I found some interesting info on the causes of ice ages in my kid&#039;s 6th grade science textbook.

And then &#039;consider the source&#039; when you hear something about global warming. Al Gore, for instance, is making millions of dollars selling &#039;carbon offsets&#039;. Oil companies aren&#039;t the only ones with a monetary interest here.

I have found a good rule of thumb is to disbelieve ANYTHING a politician or salesman tells me (and keep my hand on my wallet) until I&#039;ve done my own research. And listening to rock stars and movie actors on science questions is just a plain ol&#039; waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem I have with this whole issue is the concept of ’scientific consensus’. Consensus is a political, not scientific, term. Science requires research, experimentation and debate. But &#8216;consensus&#8221; is never the goal.</p>
<p>Here’s an interesting, albeit non-scientific, exercise: You know there’s lot’s of information to find out there by doing a Google search for ‘global warming’, and a lot of it is quite scary; but try adding ‘climatologist’ to your search terms and the results &#8211; the ‘consensus’, if you will &#8211; changes dramatically. It’s quite interesting how many actual climatologists are anthropogenic global warming doubters, compared with the doomsayers who are mostly in other fields like geology, biology, journalism, politics, fashion, and entertainment.</p>
<p>Try it -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/</a> search?hl=en&amp;q=climatologist+global+warming</p>
<p>And then consider this question &#8211; What causes ice ages? They are cyclical, as you know; so doesn&#8217;t it seem logical that the warming periods between ice ages are part of the same cycle? Go ahead and do another Google search. Also, I found some interesting info on the causes of ice ages in my kid&#8217;s 6th grade science textbook.</p>
<p>And then &#8216;consider the source&#8217; when you hear something about global warming. Al Gore, for instance, is making millions of dollars selling &#8216;carbon offsets&#8217;. Oil companies aren&#8217;t the only ones with a monetary interest here.</p>
<p>I have found a good rule of thumb is to disbelieve ANYTHING a politician or salesman tells me (and keep my hand on my wallet) until I&#8217;ve done my own research. And listening to rock stars and movie actors on science questions is just a plain ol&#8217; waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerri</title>
		<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/07/21/portrait-of-an-environmental-hack-job/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 03:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/07/21/portrait-of-an-environmental-hack-job/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Thanks for the resarch! I&#039;m subscribing to your feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Thanks for the resarch! I&#8217;m subscribing to your feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.247 seconds -->

