<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Eating Local Food is Worse Than Flying Grapes in From Chile?</title>
	<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/</link>
	<description>Exploring the New Values of the 21st Century Citizen</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Greenmonk Associates : On Clover-choked New Zealand, Christine Keeler and Food Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-375</link>
		<author>Greenmonk Associates : On Clover-choked New Zealand, Christine Keeler and Food Miles</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>[...] According to 21st Century Citizen the New York Times today carries an opinion piece about New Zealand-based scientists who &#8220;recently published a study challenging the premise that more food miles automatically mean greater fossil fuel consumption&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] According to 21st Century Citizen the New York Times today carries an opinion piece about New Zealand-based scientists who &#8220;recently published a study challenging the premise that more food miles automatically mean greater fossil fuel consumption&#8221;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-373</link>
		<author>Kevin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment and the pointer to the Globe article. 

And I agree with your comment as well -- let's engage in a discussion and work to understand what the overall best way to manage food supply is, rather than just assume local food is the answer. 

I believe local food is at least *part* of the answer, but we need to be open to a variety of ideas.

Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment and the pointer to the Globe article. </p>
<p>And I agree with your comment as well &#8212; let&#8217;s engage in a discussion and work to understand what the overall best way to manage food supply is, rather than just assume local food is the answer. </p>
<p>I believe local food is at least *part* of the answer, but we need to be open to a variety of ideas.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-372</link>
		<author>Sara Zoe</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>I absolutely welcome articles like this that encourage people to look at the complexities of food systems and think about what makes sense. Although I indulged in the occasional Backyard Beauty this past winter, I understood that just because it was local didn't make it efficient. But I think the Eat Local movement in general helps people to think a little more about their food - and we can also start emphasizing all of the other benefits to eating locally in addition to food miles. 

The Boston Globe had a similar article a couple weeks ago, and Jen Maiser had a well-wriiten response: http://www.eatlocalchallenge.com/2007/07/boston-globe-th.html

glad to see so much coverage of the eat local issues here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely welcome articles like this that encourage people to look at the complexities of food systems and think about what makes sense. Although I indulged in the occasional Backyard Beauty this past winter, I understood that just because it was local didn&#8217;t make it efficient. But I think the Eat Local movement in general helps people to think a little more about their food - and we can also start emphasizing all of the other benefits to eating locally in addition to food miles. </p>
<p>The Boston Globe had a similar article a couple weeks ago, and Jen Maiser had a well-wriiten response: <a href="http://www.eatlocalchallenge.com/2007/07/boston-globe-th.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eatlocalchallenge.com/2007/07/boston-globe-th.html</a></p>
<p>glad to see so much coverage of the eat local issues here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich O.</title>
		<link>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-370</link>
		<author>Rich O.</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.21st-century-citizen.com/2007/08/06/local-food-new-york-times-article-better-for-environment/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>An interesting article, thanks for pointing it out to us.

I agree that local food seems naturally like it should have a lower environmental impact -- and the article mentions nothing about genetically modified foods or the other issues with factory farming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article, thanks for pointing it out to us.</p>
<p>I agree that local food seems naturally like it should have a lower environmental impact &#8212; and the article mentions nothing about genetically modified foods or the other issues with factory farming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.239 seconds -->
